Wednesday, March 25, 2009

Just Freaking ASTONISHING Obliviousness, There

The housing market is in the toilet.


We ARE all aware of that, by now, right?

The general economy is in the toilet, too.

We ARE all aware of that by now, right?

OK; so if we're all aware of this, how is it that housing developers can be so outstandingly oblivious to it?


Condominiums.

Not just any condos; REALLY REALLY EXPENSIVE condos; the basic unit is a less-than-600 square foot one-bedroom.

My apartment roughly matches this.

But they want EIGHT TIMES as much money for these than I pay for mine. (Actually, a little more, but let's not quibble over fractions.)

The sale price for the one-bedroom apartments is supposedly $299, 950 for the cheapest unit in the development. Unsurprisingly, they have sold NOT. ONE. UNIT.

The article in the Seattle Times is eye-opening. It purports to be about a housing developer doing something to spur sales; namely, offering to make rent payments for 6 months if the buyer loses their job after moving in.

But really. Are they honestly this astonished that no-one is moving in? REALLY?

THREE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS FOR A ONE-BEDROOM APARTMENT?

...And you have to seriously ASK why you can't sell these fuckers?

There is, clearly, no shortage of stupid.

Let me put this in perspective.

$300,000 for a 595-square foot 1-bedroom apartment, in Seattle.

Or, in Houston:


We've now bought a house and two condos, and we're up to a tenth - a TENTH - of the price of ONE of these units in Seattle.


We're now up to a THIRD of the price of one of these condos in Seattle, and so far we've bought 3 houses, 4 condos, and a duplex. This is enough housing for over 20 people.


We're now 2/3 of our way to the goal; we're up to 3 houses, 8 condos, a duplex, and three townhouses - housing at a minimum for 30 people.


Whoa there, went a bit over - 3 months' rent on the Seattle condo over, to be precise, but look what we got for it. $307,500 got us 6 HOUSES, 10 CONDOS, 2 DUPLEXES, and 3 TOWNHOUSES - enough housing for 47 people, using 1 per condo, 3 per "family."

FORTY-SEVEN PEOPLE COULD OWN THEIR HOMES FOR THE SAME PRICE AS YOUR FUCKING CONDO.

Are you SERIOUSLY confused as to why you can't sell that piece of shit?

0 Comments: