Political Metablogging And Irony, Part 2.

[Poorly spelled and grammatically incorrect ranting and left-wing Marxism.]

[Irrelevant point that begs the question while purporting to address a current political issue.]

[Second irrelevant point followed by ad hominem attacks against opposing viewpoints, and accusations that opposing viewpoints are equivalent to fascism.]

[Third irrelevant point containing stream-of-consciousness - style rant about a totally unrelated political issue. Further discussion of rampant fascism amongst holders of opposing viewpoints, plus extended discussion of said holders' clearly obvious ignorance and general stupidity in vehement and potentially legally liable sense.]

[Total divergence into yet a third, also completely unrelated political issue containing no points of congruity with the original point; lavish use of strawman arguments and the slippery slope fallacy.]

[Transparent attempt to disguise the three pseudo-arguments as a single cohesive statement using "global climate change" to cover the points of difference; reference to the rightness of poster's chosen environmental defense charity.]

[Rambling conclusion alleging that poster's arguments are valid because they are the only ones who truly care for the planet based on their aforementioned environmental defense charity; claims that said charity will throw red paint upon the aforementioned holders of opposing political views, who are then accused of idiocy and threatened with Rainbow Coalition parades in their hometowns.]